We must remember the LNG projects is still proceeding

Let’s remind ourselves that the Tacoma PSE proposed Tideflats (Port of Tacoma) LNG Facility is still proceeding; for example, see:

• “PSE DEIS Executive Summary.pdf.” online at http://cms.cityoftacoma.org/planning/pse/PSE%20DEIS%20Executive%20Summary.pdf (visited Jan. 26, 2016).
• “PSE Proposed Tideflats LNG Facility – City of Tacoma.” (n.d.) online at http://www.cityoftacoma.org/cms/One.aspx?pageId=67144. (visited Jan. 26, 2016).

Let’s really see just what went into the “final” SEPA EIS document for Tacoma Community (people) and environmental understanding about the Tacoma LNG Facility? We must look at the final analysis presented within the Tacoma EIS document.

• But see, John Sherman, Consider The Environmental Impacts Before Writing the Environmental Statement (pdf file: t20160126b.pdf) (Jan. 27, 2016) (did Tacoma City Government throw the Tacoma Community (people) under the tires of the loose, runaway, people’s health and safety bus?) (create your own inference what the final SEPA EIS decided for community health and safety result), (rev. 1/27/2016 pm), online at https://johnesherman.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/t20160126b1.pdf (visited Jan. 27, 2016).

While, our attention has been directed towards the current SEPA EIS for methane-to-methanol plant; thus, I don’t remember that my Tacoma Community people have been informed yet about the LNG plant operating in Tacoma and its current status? Especially relevant, Haven’t seen any LNG article published in local Tacoma newspaper or Tacoma City Government making the Community public announcement: this LNG plant is completely environmentally safe for the Tacoma Community as a new LNG industry plant? Maybe, I just missed the good news about this LNG plant?

////

Revised Jan. 27, 2016::1220 PST